Ok, so here it is, and I will wait with the Temeraire review, maybe till I finish the first trilogy. It’s late, but recent Paris bombings occupied my mind most of the weekend. I’ve even spent lots of time arguing about politics on the internet, never a good idea and something I’ve tried to avoid for a long time. But I had an unusually emotional reaction and needed to rant a bit 😉
First – both my TBR (To Be Read) and TBB (To Be Both) lists measure in hundreds. I’d like to read everything and I’d love to have a hardback copy of most of the fantasy & s/f books ever published.
Today – two very short reviews of books different by any measure but background – both are deeply rooted in Nordic myths. The use their respective authors make of said background is very different but that doesn’t change the fact that I enjoyed both of them. And as a bonus – a few words on author smart and influential, but not widely known outside hardcore genre fans.
Innovative use of mythology in complicated multi-faceted story (for the fifties) vs undemanding fun. Which might mean that you’ll go thrugh 580 p. “Odin” faster than through 231 p. “Sword”, but that’s no way to judge the relative value of books. It’s not a contest, I just wanted to write two short reviews, so I needed two books having something in common 😉
Recently, when commenting on infamous “The Last Ringbearer” I said that to find complicated, morally dubious Elves, one should read Sapkowski. And I stand by that statement, but another book that offers an unusual look at this fair race is “The Broken Sword” by Poul Anderson, prolific but slightly forgotten author. The book published in 1954, incidentally a year when certain other book was published as well. Tolkien is, deservedly, more famous, but Anderson is also worth a look. It is not without reason that some important names were involved in his recent tribute anthology by the renowned Subterranean Press.